[lit-ideas] Re: Sick dogs and virtue epist.
- From: Walter Okshevsky <wokshevs@xxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 10:40:47 -0230 (NDT)
Not really one of your more enlightening posts, Robert. Querying whether
Erin's dog really "knows" anything would have been more interesting.
But an even more interesting question that emerges from the dog story is
whether we can hold people morally responsible for their unjustified
beliefs. (Well, it does take a few steps to get to it, I admit.) And if
so, under what circumstances? For the past few months now,
I've been haunted with the matter of whether epistemic virtues and moral
virtues have some common root. If so, that would have distinct
philosophical and educational implications (most of which I must admit
presently elude me, most probably). Wondering what the list has to say
about this question. As well as Erin's dog of course.
Cheers, Walter
Memorial U
On Fri, 10 Jun 2004, Robert Paul wrote:
> -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
> -- Type: text/enriched
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
