[lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant"; "None taken" -- the implicature
- From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:46:11 EDT
Oops, I notice a typo -- is it. The phrase seems to be "no offence MEANT",
rather than "no offence MADE". Actually, if it's the antonym of 'taken', it
should be "no offence GIVEN".
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant"; "None taken" -- the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature
- » [lit-ideas] Re: "No offence meant", "None taken": the implicature