I really think you should pay more attention to Grice's cure for cancer.On Mon, 2 Aug 2010, Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx wrote:
From Haidt's quotes: "Morality is so rich and complex." As opposed to 'poor and simple'. In general, 'rich' is overused. "Itÿÿs so multifaceted and contradictory. But many authors reduce it to a single principle, which is usually some variant of welfare maximization. So that would be the sugar. Or sometimes, itÿÿs justice and related notions of fairness and rights. And that would be the chemist down the street. So basically, thereÿÿs two restaurants to choose from. Thereÿÿs the utilitarian grille, and thereÿÿs the deontological diner. Thatÿÿs pretty much it." I think he has it right. Grice who disliked a choice, would say, "Kantotle" (or Ariskant), or how to make a deontological diner in the utilitarian (teleological, I prefer) grille. "We need metaphors and analogies to think about difficult topics, such as morality." We don't. Morality boils down to conation. And there's nothing metaphoric as "She wanted to kill him". A propositional attitude, like "... wants ..." is build upon a "THEORETICAL" concept ('want' now, part of psychological theory). Vide, Grice: Method in philosophical psychology: from the banal to the bizarre: now repr. in one of the best morality books published in the 90s: The Conception of Value (ed. by J. Baker out of Grice's notes for the Carus Lectures -- Grice died in 1988). "An analogy that Marc Hauser and John Mikhail have developed in recent years is that morality is like language. And I think itÿÿs a very, very good metaphor. It illuminates many aspects of morality." R. M. Hare said it much better, "The language of morals", but bored Grice so! "Itÿÿs particularly good, I think, for sequences of actions that occur in time with varying aspects of intentionality. But, once we expand the moral domain beyond harm, I find that metaphors drawn from perception become more illuminating, more useful." Well, no need to GO metaphorical. Both 'see' and 'want' usually take (or should ALWAYS) take 'that'-clause. He saw the sun. He wanted Mary. But in fact, it's "he saw that the sun was rising", or "He wanted to make love to Mary", i.e. "he wanted that he would make love to Mary". Nothing metaphorical there. "Iÿÿm not trying to say that the language analogy is wrong or deficient. Iÿÿ m just saying, letÿÿs think of another analogy, a perceptual analogy." McCreery adds: "To an anthropologist entranced for more than four decades by Levi-Straussÿÿ call to consider the ÿÿlogic in tangible qualitiesÿÿ" ---- pretty vague. All qualities are MORE than 'tangible'. Seeing is not really 'tangible'. It's like saying, with Saint Exupery, 'what is essential is invisible to the eyes'. Pretty nonsensical. There are 'perceptual qualia' to use the philosopher's lexicon (singular, 'quale'). A quale is a very difficult thing to conceptualise, and we don't need 'tangible', misused, attached to it. ---- vide Peacocke, a disciple of Grice, "Sense and content". Oxford: Clarendon Press. In general, the moral theorists who believe that there are "real" moral qualia out there oppose Peacocke and adopt an approach more like Blackburn's quasi-realism concerning attitudes. All wrong! "and a student of Victor Turner, who envisions dominant symbols as bipolarÿÿ one pole a cluster of concepts the other, the sensory pole, a cluster of tangible qualities that evoke powerful emotions, Haidtÿÿs thinking is highly appealing. What say others here?" I like the bipolar thing, but refudiate it. No need to go Dualists, and Cartesian Dualists at something pretty simple. Take, "The cat is on the mat" --- that's a concept, or it involves the concepts -- Fregean senses -- 'cat', 'mat', 'to be on'. Surely there are perceptual attachments to each concepts. If you say, with Palin, "Chortles refudiate frumiously", unless you provide a perceptual correlate to the alleged concepts (e.g. 'refudiate') we don't know what we are meaning. And it's ALL, pace Grice, about meaning. J. L. Speranza The Swimming-Pool Library Villa Speranza, Bordighera John -- John McCreery The Word Works, Ltd., Yokohama, JAPAN Tel. +81-45-314-9324 jlm@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.wordworks.jp/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| /begin/read__>sig.file: postal address palma University of KwaZulu-Natal Philosophy 3rd floor of Memorial Tower Building Howard College Campus Durban 4041 South Africa Tel off: [+27] 031 2601591 (sec: Mrs. Yolanda Hordyk) [+27] 031-2602292 Fax [+27] 031-2603031 mobile 07 62 36 23 91 calling from overseas +[27] 76 2362391 EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxx EMAIL: palma@xxxxxxxxxx MY OFFICE IS A290@Mtb *only when in Europe*: inst. J. Nicod 29 rue d'Ulm f-75005 paris france ________ This e-mail message (and attachments) is confidential, and/or privileged and is intended for the use of the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail you must not copy, distribute, take any action in reliance on it or disclose it to anyone. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you. This entity is not responsible for any information not related to the business of this entity. If you received this e-mail in error please destroy the original and notify the sender. ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Ratio, enim, nisi judex universalis esse deberet, frustra singulis datur. [ _Quaestiones Naturales_, Adelard of Bath ] Signora granda, testa che massa massa ne passa, che quasi schissa, Dia dei sostegni de cese e palassi Dia de le taje che su ne tien fissi Dia de le onde che le ne fa grassi, ne ingrassa de ogni grassia, Dia Venessia - aàh Venessia aàh Venàssia aàh Venùsia Andrea Zanzotto, Filò, (Sezione: Recitativo Veneziano)