In regard to France, I have read similar comments in Jonathan Fenby's France on the Brink, Jean-Francois Revel's Anti-Americanism, and Bruce Bawer's While Europe Slept. Bawer spent a lot of time in Holland and Norway and the same seems to be true in those nations, but worse in Holland. Oriana Fallaci waxed in eloquent outrage about this sort of thing happening in Italy (in her books The Rage and the Pride, and The Force of Reason). Claire Berlinski generalizes about much of Europe in Menace in Europe, Why the Continent's Crisis is America's Too. Perhaps her treatment of Germany is most interesting. I've also encountered this common assessment in a great number of articles. By the way, I have also read Daniel Pipes Militant Islam Reaches America. The tenor of his book is different from the other's I've mentioned. Certain things have happened here but as much as anything they involve inattention. We do finally wake up and arrest the Islamists for breaking our laws. We do have our multiculturalists, but they are apparently not as pervasive as they are in continental Europe. The head covering issue is always mentioned by those who argue that Islamic is not making Islamic inroads into European society. It presented as a sign that France is cracking down on Islamic intrusions, but France has probably had more Islamic intrusions than any other European country. It invites in immigrants and doesn't impose any requirements on them. They don't need to have jobs. They don't need to speak French. They don't need to get a job. Furthermore they can live in the Islamic enclave if their choice. Muslims need to have their prayer time. They need to be off Friday. They need halal food. They need you to not joke about anything they do or say, especially not anything about Islam or Mohammad. Maybe you are used to joking about Christianity, but you'd better not do that with Islam or we'll burn your cars. We'll burn a whole bunch of cars. Then too, daughters are mutilated at the desire of the parents with no interference. If someone wants several wives, no one will arrest him. If a father needs to kill his daughter to preserve the honor of the family, he will receive a light sentence for doing so, because that is "there way," and their way (not the French way which has laws against these actions) needs to be respected. Lawrence _____ From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judith Evans Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:06 AM To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Mexican protesting LH>In continental Europe immigrants have had success in flouting the LH>law, especially in forcing various nations to accept Islamic standards LH>in lieu of their own. Europe has been fairly successful in restricting LH>the influence of Christianity, but it hasn't been willing to apply those LH>same restrictions to Islam. Could you say a bit more, with citations, about both of these things (i.e. restricting Christianity and not restricting Islam) w/ref to (at least 2) European countries? (France's official secularism applies to all religions equally -- though I have a feeling Christians are somewhat advantaged when it comes to what can be worn in schools -- Britain is de facto secular but of course England has a Christian Established church. Britain has gaoled Muslim priests. France wouldn't have let those priests into the country in the first place. So, well, you must be thinking of other countries.) Oh yes. Car burning. There were some pretty heavy riots in France recently and they got the law changed. They weren't mentioned here, presumably because the rioters weren't Muslim. Judy Evans, Cardiff ----- Original Message ----- From: Lawrence <mailto:lawrencehelm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Helm To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:53 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Mexican protesting Joseph, A: No. B: I hope not. In continental Europe immigrants have had success in flouting the law, especially in forcing various nations to accept Islamic standards in lieu of their own. Europe has been fairly successful in restricting the influence of Christianity, but it hasn't been willing to apply those same restrictions to Islam. Why?