[lit-ideas] Re: Hitler/Stalin - Stewart/Colbert Tag Team

  • From: "veronica caley" <molleo1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:36:32 -0400

Dear Bonzo,

I accept your comments as perfectly valid. I watch Colbert and Stewart, as I watch liberal cable, because I have watched right wing stuff, Limbaugh, et. al. I don't want to watch right wing stuff or listen to it because I find it more offensive. What I like about what I do watch, whether straight or comedy, is that it tells me what these important political figures are saying, compared to what they said in the past. No other programs do that, to my knowledge.

I watch Rachel Maddow because she is a meticulous researcher, as the Rhodes scholar that she is. I know she leans to the left, and I take it into account. If you have watched any network world news, or some other cable channels, you will know why I watch the above programs.

A few weeks ago, there were some really important things happening on the world stage and in the US. I tuned into ABC world news. There was barely a mention of two or three of maybe eight important developments, but there was a segment of how people celebrate birthdays around the world. 'Nough said about that.

NPR had a discussion re health care issue this week and there were two positions, one pro one con. Not a word was said about the con guy being a lobbyist for the health care industry. This was uncovered by Maddow. BBC and CBC would not cover these.

I read a great deal about current and historical issues, but I can only read so much and I need to read some decent novels from time to time, to maintain my sanity. I read newspapers on line and off and also several magazines.

I was in Canada a few weeks ago and bought both their major Saturday papers. I was astounded that the Globe and Mail had two items, both dealing with the threat of losing democracy in Canada, one an editorial. I was astounded to read an editorial about how destructive salt is and how more and more of it is in processed food.

I already knew this, because I read Nutrition Action, a publication of Center for Science in the Public Interest. I would bet you that not 5% of Americans know it. But now a lot more Canadians do.

Re your other comments concerning nihilism, irony etc. it's probably true. It is also true, unfortunately, that most people in the US, especially the young, don't read much. And when they do, it's romance novels and adventure tales. Which is fine, but not enough.

Google something re surveys on what people know about the Constitution for example, read it and weep. I do, and I am also scared. If people could analyze what these people in the right wing media are saying, they would stop listening to it. Furthermore, people evidently can't see the hypocrisy or don't care. Exhibit A: Bill O'Reilley writing a book on morality for the young, shortly after paying off a woman for sexual harassment, to keep himself out of court.

Yours,
Veronica


----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Yost" <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 4:39 PM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Hitler/Stalin - Stewart/Colbert Tag Team


"Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert"


A few friends also rely on Comedy Central for news. I don't know what to say to them about it, so I change the subject when those guys come up. Here, I can vent.

Can't anyone see that something is terribly wrong with the popularity of Stewart and Colbert? Maybe imagining them as right-wing comics would help. Maybe not. The problem is more than political. It's the reinforcement of nihilism, of irony-as-worldview with no positive counterargument.

Comedy Central's main demographic audience, unlike Veronica, has no understanding of any social, political, or economic issues. Instead they receive biases wrapped in jokes. The indoctrination is subliminal. Comedy substituting for reading.

What about Limbaugh and the rest of the talk radio people? The conservative gasbags rely on outright verbal persuasion. A listener can accept or reject faulty arguments and slander using the critical thought available to them. It's in-your-face politics, take it or leave it.

TV politicomedy disguised as news, on the other hand, bypasses the critical faculties. A good joke, even if laden with faulty argument and slander, is accepted as entertainment. Goes straight to the funny bone. "It's just a joke. Lighten up." Hitler/Stalin could only dream about such plausible deniability; lacking it, they had their secret police and prison networks.

Sure I'm making too much of it ("It's just a joke. Lighten up.") but ironic nihilism only plays in favor of the ruling elite, whatever their politics or agenda for the rest of us.

Off my rocker,
Bonzo
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: