Maybe not directly (except in passing), but a huge military is effectively an extension of the gun mentality. Fighting is fighting, it's all the same except in variables, like numbers killed or threatened. How is someone living with domestic violence different from someone living in fear of a terrorist? That's why there's no real qualitative difference between the sides. It's all the same same except for the excuse and the means. Get rid of the underlying motivations and the excuse will be unnecessary and the means irrelevant. Unfortunately, nobody is looking at the underlying motivations, again except me, and all I manage is to bore people. Omar Kusturica <omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: --- Andy wrote: > Just want to mention that when I said to Omar that > he has no right to complain about extensive gun > ownership in the U.S. because the other side is > doing the same thing without guns, it was a > statement of inclusion. I even said birds of a > feather. *I've noticed. However, I don't remember expressing any position on personal gun ownership in the US. Frankly, even though I have never owned a gun, I have more respect for the people who rely on personal guns to protect their identity and manhood, than for those who rely on the Big Brother to do so. O.K. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com