Le 18 janv. 05, =E0 18:40, Phil Enns a =E9crit : > > For Nietzsche, then, truth is not something that can be rejected or > denied. M.C. I guess Phil forgot to read the quotes I posted yesterday. Here is=20= one of them again : "There exists neither spirit, nor reason, nor=20 thinking, nor consciousness, nor soul, nor will, *nor truth*" (Will to=20= power, trans. Kaufmann-Hollingdale, =A7 480). Now, whatever Phil says, this is clear proof that Nietzsche = *does*=20 reject truth, for the excellent reason that *he states so=20 unambiguously*. > > It makes no sense to claim that Nietzsche rejects truth, M.C. Yes it does, *because he says he does* : "Truth"? Who forced this=20= word on me=A0? But I repudiate it=A0; but I disdain this proud word" = (WTP =20 =A7 749). What "makes no sense" is to continue maintaining one's position=20= unchanged in the fact of quite obvious evidence to the contrary. It=20 would be like, say, looking at the current situation in Iraq and=20 claiming that everything is hunky-dory. Perhaps that's the key to understanding contemporary American=20 politics. The ability to look evidence straight in the face and deny it=20= something is one that escapes me, and yet one that Bush and his cronies=20= have no problem whatsoever with. Thus, when the Bushies and their=20 supporters tell us that all objectives have been achieved in Iraq,=20 they're not lying=A0: they just have developed that very special skill = of=20 looking at p and declaring it to be not-p. Best, Mike. > > > Michael Chase (goya@xxxxxxxxxxx) CNRS UPR 76 7, rue Guy Moquet Villejuif 94801 France ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html