[lit-ideas] Re: Brits do it better

  • From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:11:35 -0400

How do you explain the botched  Katrina effort? 



> [Original Message]
> From: Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 8/23/2006 4:48:03 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Brits do it better
>
>
>
> U.S. Homeland Security forbidden by law from tactics Brits 
> used to foil attack
>
>
> The Homeland Security Department has neither the legal nor 
> technical tools to match the British capture of terrorist 
> operatives before they were about to blow up passenger 
> airliners.
>
> Officials said U.S. law would not have allowed the FBI to 
> conduct the type of surveillance that led Britain to uncover 
> the al Qaeda cell and capture what could be the network?s 
> chief. They said the department also does not have the 
> funding to detect new types of bombs used by al Qaeda.
>
> ''What helped the British in this case is the ability to be 
> nimble, to be fast, to be flexible, to operate based on 
> fast-moving information,'' Homeland Security Secretary 
> Michael Chertoff said.
>
> Officials said British authorities have greater powers of 
> surveillance and investigation, which facilitated the 
> capture of more than 20 suspected al Qaeda plotters. In 
> contrast, they said, Congress has been reviewing the Bush 
> administration's warrantless eavesdropping program and 
> military tribunals.
>
> full story at: 
> http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/DHS.htm
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html


------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: