Eric, I think I assumed that when you said > Just as we know that the CIA installed the Shah of > Iran. But > what few realize is that prior to that, the Soviets > controlled Iran that was what you meant. There wasn't a coup (I believe), there was a forced abdication of Reza Shah and an installation of Mohammed Reza Pahlavi (his son), in 1941 (I thought, that is the date I have) following an invasion of Iran by Britain and the Soviet Union. But there was a CIA-backed "coup" in 1953 (I should have mentioned this but was focussing on the installation of the Shah), after (in 1951) the Iranian parliament, led by Mossadegh's nationalist party, voted to nationalise the oil industry. Shortly afterwards, Mossadegh became Prime Minister. Britain was the main aggrieved party economically and tried to get the US to join a coup attempt. Truman refused. Britain later managed to get Eisenhower to agree by using anti-Communist arguments; Mossadegh wasn't closely allied to the Iranian Communist Party but hadn't acted decisively against them. (But that wasn't why the British were annoyed.) Stalin, who had been seriously ill for a while, died before that coup. > In 1946 > parts of Iran were occupied by British forces and > the Red > Army had occupied the northern parts. Yes. (As a preventive invasion, in 1941, against Iran's joining or aiding the Axis Powers -- as above.) And the USSR refused to withdraw its troops on the agreed date in 1946, and there was a mini-crisis. But there wasn't a coup, nor was the Shah installed then. (See above.) Judy Evans, Cardiff ___________________________________________________________ The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html