Our sources now say much the same, Eric. My points in reply to your > > Just as we know that the CIA installed the Shah > of > > > Iran. But > > > what few realize is that prior to that, the > Soviets > > > controlled Iran are 1. the Shah was installed in 1941. 2. The USSR did not control Iran before that. You first instanced the "Iran crisis" of 1946. The Shah was in situ. The USSR did not control Iran then, it was one of two occupying powers, who had agreed to invade to prevent Iran supporting the Axis Powers (as I have said). now you point to the "coup"/"counter-coup" of 1953 to which I'd just pointed, which could, at a stretch, have been said to "re-install the Shah"; you quote "The most accurate term for the > forceful > ousting of Prime Minister Mossadegh would be counter > coup, that's 1953. The USSR did not control Iran then. That Mossadegh was vulnerable to > exaggerated > British claims that (Mossadegh) was a Soviet proxy does not show that EY>the Soviets controlled Iran. If you have any evidence that the CIA installed the Shah > of > > > Iran. prior to that, the > Soviets > > > controlled Iran post it. (Not evidence that Iran had a Communist Party, not evidence that a Prime Minister needed the parliamentary support of a Communist Party (if that is so), not evidence that the USSR, the US and Britain contended for control of Iran, not evidence that the Soviet Union and Britain both Iran. Evidence that the USSR controlled Iran. It would be nice if that could also be related to the installation of the Shah, but well, we can't have everything. Judy Evans, Cardiff ___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html