[lit-ideas] Re: "A Proposition Is A Fact" (Tractatus)

  • From: Jlsperanza@xxxxxxx
  • To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:08:46 EDT

In a message dated 4/22/2009 7:51:54 A.M.  Eastern Daylight Time, 
donalmcevoyuk@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
You cannot have  "certain knowledge" and be wrong (by definition of 
"certain knowledge"). But  there is no "certain knowledge" only conjectural 
knowledge. So, in the sense in  which we have actual "knowledge", we can "know 
and 
be wrong".

Popper is  not alone in this view (which can be traced to Xenophanes).

---
He's  the one who would bury himself in horse manure? No. Not Popper, 
Xenophanes, I  mean.

Provide the Greek.

Yes, languages are important.

I  would be surprised if Witters or Poppers knew Greek or Latin, so 
possibly  Xenophanes escaped them.

Nobody in his right mind would have attempted  anything as _dry_ as the 
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus in the classical  tradition of philosophy. But 
the Germans, they _think_ they are superior, and  they are not. Russell was a 
case. He should have stayed with numbers. But there  he felt his role in 
his boring story of Western philosophy was to be the mecenas  of this obscure 
Austrian engineer. And the rest is history.

In Oxford  they could never tolerate Wittgenstein. "Who is this man, and 
why should we  spending any consideration on him. He cannot even write either 
Latin or English.  Off with him."

In Cambridge, the tradition has always been physics (e.g  the observatory), 
so philosophy never had a 'bite' with them. Imagine my  discontent if my 
father would say, "You are going to legacy, to King's College,  where your 
granddad and myself went". Bollocks. I would possibly commit  suicide.

Legacy in Oxford is important but not so. Balliol for example,  has legacy 
with Indian brahmin, but the ordinary English type ignores them.  Jesus 
(College) has legacy with Welsh methodists, but the English type ignores  them. 

So that leaves us Corpus Christi, Merton, and St. John's, the  three 
colleges associated with Grice.

"proposition", "fact" "Can the  words be so different that they make sense 
in German but not in English?". Of  course. 

First, neither 'proposition' nor 'fact' _are_ English. The  Anglo-Saxons 
never used them. When people bring to my attention (if these people  are 
WASPs) a term of Latin origin, I say, 'look for the Anglo-Saxon  counterpart'. 
If 
they can't, good riddance.

I would not think that the  Anglo-Saxons needed a word for 'proposition' 
and 'fact' as they needed one for  'axe', 'plunder' and 'rape'. 

In Latinate countries it is different,  because some of these people never 
had a CHOICE. "fact" gives 'fait' as in fait  accompli in French, or 'fatto' 
or 'hecho' in Spanish. "C'est un fait que ...",  It is a fact that I ... 
makes sense. Note that 'fatto' is not used much in  Italian. They realise it's 
an otiose construction.

Indeed, in Argentina,  loaded with Italians as it is, 'fatto' means a 
'messy fact'. "En que fatto te  has metido": Now that's some pretty mess you 
got 
yourself into".  It's  usually associated with Italian maffia. "Esta tiene 
un fatto con el cafisho ese"  (This whore has some messy business with that 
dangerous pimp). Etc. "Fact" has  no _clean_ uses.

Proposition is a scholar silly, nice, fine point. It's a  noun out of 
nowhere, thus otiose. 

"My mother counts her chicken"

Is that a fact? If she finishes counting  her chicken, is it still a fact? 
Or it _was_ a fact? You see, the grammar is  otiose and misleading. 

Austin knew about this, and was fascinated by  

a man of words and not  of deeds is like a garden full of weeds.

--- deed is the word. Deed is  the Anglo-Saxon word. "Words and Deeds" was 
the title of the lecture he gave.  Word is wrong, but 'deed' is okay. Oddly, 
when my tutor translated that into  Argentinian, it came published as "Como 
hacer cosas con palabras" and then  "Palabras y acciones". But of course 
"Palabras y hechos" would have been better  in that 'hecho' is, well, a fact 
-- something done.

Cheers,

JL  Speranza  

**************Access 350+ FREE radio stations anytime from anywhere on the 
web. Get the Radio Toolbar! 
(http://toolbar.aol.com/aolradio/download.html?ncid=emlcntusdown00000003)
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: