[LRflex] Re: Summilux 25 manual focusing
- From: Juan Gea-Banacloche <banacloj@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 20:00:37 -0400
On May 7, 2007, at 2:59 PM, chfalke@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Phil,
> Interesting answer I didn't think of.
> I wasn't thinking about the speed, 2.8 is OK, but the size
> and weight. But you make a good point, once you carry
> the zoom, that's all you need to carry most of the time,
> the fanny pack can stay home.
> And when I think of how small the 35 would be, I'm thinking
> of my tiny M lens. Even at a focal length of 17.5, needing to
> clear the mirror would make for a bigger package.
> Charlie.
>
> ---- phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I'm perfectly happy with the 14-50 2.8 so my answer is no - the
>> half a sto=
>> p can be obtained via ISO setting.
>> Yours
>>
>> Phil...x
>>
>>
>>
Actually, I think that if one gets a 1.4 that performs well at f:1.4
and focuses accurately at 1.4, cranking up the ISO is no substitute.
Depth of field, depth of field!
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
