[LRflex] Re: Summilux 25 manual focusing
- From: phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:17:13 +0200
Hi Charlie,
Size: from what I saw of Howard's Summi (looks like a sumo - wink) I woul=
dn't expect a 35 to be leaner - the D 25 is far from the M feel in any cas=
e. =
I use my R 24 Elmarit as a 50mm (F2.8 only that's true) but perfectly manu=
al , and not so bad in most cases. NO AF / no OIS. And, sure the bokeh is =
not that of a summi's. =
What Howard showed us has very fine rendition (I would have liked a bit of=
colour testing though) and an undeniable Summi touch to his two portraits=
=2E
Yours
Phil...x
----Message d'origine----
>Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:59:27 -0400
>De: <chfalke=40cox.net>
>A: leicareflex=40freelists.org
>Sujet: =5BLRflex=5D Re: Summilux 25 manual focusing
>Copie =E0: phamard=40numericable.fr
>
>Phil,
> Interesting answer I didn't think of.
> I wasn't thinking about the speed, 2.8 is OK, but the size =
>and weight. But you make a good point, once you carry =
>the zoom, that's all you need to carry most of the time, =
>the fanny pack can stay home.
> And when I think of how small the 35 would be, I'm thinking =
>of my tiny M lens. Even at a focal length of 17.5, needing to clear the=
mirror would make for a bigger package.
>Charlie.
>
>---- phamard=40numericable.fr wrote: =
>> I'm perfectly happy with the 14-50 2.8 so my answer is no - the half a =
sto=3D
>> p can be obtained via ISO setting.
>> Yours
>> =
>> Phil...x
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> ----Message d'origine----
>> >Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 13:36:35 -0400
>> >De: <chfalke=3D40cox.net>
>> >A: leicareflex=3D40freelists.org
>> >Sujet: =3D5BLRflex=3D5D Re: Summilux 25 manual focusing
>> >Copie =3DE0: Howard Cummer <cummer=3D40netvigator.com>
>> >
>> >Howard,
>> >
>> >---- Howard Cummer <cummer=3D40netvigator.com> wrote: =3D
>> =
>> >
>> >> through the turning circle. It feels a bit =3D22fly by wire=3D22 . I=
think =3D
>> =3D
>> =
>> >> that it is easier and more accurate to use AF frankly.
>> >
>> >To me =3D22fly by wire=3D22 would mean like an A320, which actually fe=
els pre=3D
>> tty good. :-)
>> > Do you mean it's granular or lags the commands?
>> >Separate question, how much noise does it make, less than =3D
>> =
>> >when in AF?
>> > Still separate question somewhat off thread, how many people =3D
>> =
>> >think of 35mm as =3D22normal=3D22 and are waiting for a 17.5mm F2?
>> >Thanks,
>> >Charlie.
>> > =3D
>> =
>> >------
>> >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> > http://www3.telus.net/=3D7Etelyt/lrflex.htm
>> >Archives are at:
>> > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>> >
>> =
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> Noos, votre bureau virtuel sur Internet : Mail...
>> Web : webmail.noos.fr
>> =
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> http://www3.telus.net/=7Etelyt/lrflex.htm
>> Archives are at:
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/=7Etelyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Noos, votre bureau virtuel sur Internet : Mail...
Web : webmail.noos.fr
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
