On Jan 17, 2008, at 8:06 AM, <chfalke@xxxxxxx> <chfalke@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:45 AM, <chfalke@xxxxxxx> <chfalke@xxxxxxx> wrote:Back to the photos, Other than the different chemistry, how doyou find BW400CN compared to something like Tri-X?I like it... easy, convenient, nice tones, digital ice...etc...what doyou think? SteveSteve, The gradation and sense of light are perfectly gorgeous. It's hard enough to get BW processed at all these days, away from cities, and a lot of it isn't that good, so that's a significant practical benefit. What I was wondering was what the grain looked like in a larger print. That is harder to evaluate in a small on screen image.
thank you... C41... digital ice works... can be done wherever they do Color C41...and grain...very little at all...
much less than classic bw silver processing... but you can always add it.. :-) Steve
Cheers, Charlie. ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/