> On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:45 AM, <chfalke@xxxxxxx> <chfalke@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Back to the photos, Other than the different chemistry, how do > > you find BW400CN compared to something like Tri-X? > > > I like it... easy, convenient, nice tones, digital ice...etc...what do > you think? > > Steve > > Steve, The gradation and sense of light are perfectly gorgeous. It's hard enough to get BW processed at all these days, away from cities, and a lot of it isn't that good, so that's a significant practical benefit. What I was wondering was what the grain looked like in a larger print. That is harder to evaluate in a small on screen image. Cheers, Charlie. ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/