[LRflex] Re: IMG: more Goldeneye ducks
- From: Steve Barbour <steve.barbour@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:00:36 -0800
On Jan 12, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Richard Ward wrote:
> Hello Steve,
> you raise excellent questions about the context and circumstances of
> my observations on some of Doug's Posted jpegs. I definitely don't find
> 'all internet jpegs' to be problematic, not at all. My sentence might
> be more artfully written as seeing the noted issues in previous posts
> from the same author. When i view the images posted on the list, I
> frequently encounter gorgeous images which aren't showing the ill
> effects I see in my own personal images from extreme sharpening filtration,
> powerful curves/levels/contrast
> manipulations, image resizings by 'ham fisted' algorithims I've
> encountered in some websites, and the ill effects I've encountered
> frequently in the images from Point & Shoot cameras with tiny
> sensors.
> As for the questions about whether there are exceptions, only fron
> LUG gallery, etc - I believe Doug posts his images from a specific site
> and it's related to a website of his (if I recall correctly!) so I
> guess my comments are quite site specific.
thanks Richard, that's very interesting....Personally I have not see the
problem, though do I wonder if Doug would be willing to post identical files
for several images (perhaps you could name them) to his own site and to the LUG
site to see if they appear differently in some way to you or to anyone else...
Steve
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
