No problem here both on the Imac and the Samsung PC (safari/netscape) On the contrary, I find Doug's birds have a 'transparency' quality difficult to match ... The Baccarat of bird photos ... And the prints in the book are excellent too. Best from Metz Ph Le 12 janv. 10 à 22:00, Steve Barbour a écrit : > > > On Jan 12, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Richard Ward wrote: > >> Hello Steve, >> you raise excellent questions about the context and circumstances of >> my observations on some of Doug's Posted jpegs. I definitely don't >> find >> 'all internet jpegs' to be problematic, not at all. My sentence might >> be more artfully written as seeing the noted issues in previous posts >> from the same author. When i view the images posted on the list, I >> frequently encounter gorgeous images which aren't showing the ill >> effects I see in my own personal images from extreme sharpening >> filtration, powerful curves/levels/contrast >> manipulations, image resizings by 'ham fisted' algorithims I've >> encountered in some websites, and the ill effects I've encountered >> frequently in the images from Point & Shoot cameras with tiny >> sensors. >> As for the questions about whether there are exceptions, only fron >> LUG gallery, etc - I believe Doug posts his images from a specific >> site >> and it's related to a website of his (if I recall correctly!) so I >> guess my comments are quite site specific. > > thanks Richard, that's very interesting....Personally I have not see > the problem, though do I wonder if Doug would be willing to post > identical files for several images (perhaps you could name them) to > his own site and to the LUG site to see if they appear differently > in some way to you or to anyone else... > > > Steve > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/