On May 24, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Richard Ward wrote: > AND Leica had the lenses and the reputation to help sell the R10 at that > pricepoint. > Sigma ain't got either on their side. > > Query: Anyone else suspect a copywriter simply transposed the 9 and 6 putting > the marketing materials and press releases together and no one who should > have caught the typo? now the same copy writer got the decimal point in the wrong place, Steve > > Irregardless: Clock's still ticking on Sigma. IMO > > Richard in Michigan > ____________________________________ > > I don't know what your Problem Is, > but I bet it's Hard to Pronounce. :-) > ____________________________________ > > On May 24, 2011, at 3:53 PM, "wildlightphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" > <wildlightphoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Philippe Amard wrote: >> >>>>> >> http://photorumors.com/ >> <<< >> >> This revised/corrected price is about where Leica said it would have had to >> price the R10, which they felt was higher than the market would bear. >> Either there's something miraculous lurking under the SD-1's skin or (more >> likely IMHO) there will be further price revisions before the SD-1 gets >> much market share. >> >> Doug Herr >> Birdman of Sacramento >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >> mail2web.com – Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft® >> Exchange - http://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail >> >> >> ------ >> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: >> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ >> Archives are at: >> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/