Good Points Frank, I do wonder though how many Medium Format Sensor Cameras that can, in potentia, be sold? Wasn't a driving force behind there being a "full" range of MF Models, Makers, and Price Points, the 'necessity' of using 120/220 sized film in order to facilitate retouching of photographs? That the 'Aesthetics' of Medium Format wasn't the singular driving force for their usage for portraits, weddings, and Such? With MF Equipment now being either a Print Size Neccessity or an Aesthetics Choice rather than a 'price of admission' to give clients a minimum standard of Photogenic Improvement - I really wonder how many Hasselblad, Pentax, Leica, Nikon?, and Canon?, Big Sensored Cameras can be sold in aggregate in any given year. 10,000? 50,000? A Million? Richard in Michigan On May 27, 2011, at 10:12 AM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The biggest question, of course, is "if"..... for Sigma, but Hasselblad is > already the installed BMOC. > > You got Hasselblad on one side, pushing on features, installed base, SW, and > price point at MF size, and Sigma pushing the 35mm side, pushing on price. > C and N? Probably in the wings.... > > I have not researched the Mamiya nor other MF solutions ( I have a 500C > camera and lenses, so my interest is Hasselblad). > > If I were the S2 Product Line Manager for Leica, I'd get my resume ( cdv ) > tuned up...... > > Or marry the Boss's daughter..... > > Frank Filippone > Red735i@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > . So, here's another take on the introduction of the SD-1; if its images are > perceived to be as good as the S2, what does that mean for Leica? > > -- > best regards, > > Neil > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/