RE: Coding for a new jaws accessible app

  • From: Adrian Spratt <Adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 12:35:43 -0400

Aside from the website v. application discussion, John Martin's offer raises 
two other general questions in my mind.
First, from the initial responses, one broad question is which of three 
categories JAWS users would assign the greatest importance: an application (or 
website) that promotes employment, one that opens up social interaction or one 
that provides pure entertainment. All three areas are critical for a good life. 
But as philosophers point out, a hungry man doesn't worry about free speech. 
I'd think that making ribbon-driven MS Access or Google docs is a priority.
Second, why should this burden fall on one generous man? Maybe one result of 
this discussion could be establishing a list of priorities that we all submit 
to FS to try to persuade them to fix problems that constantly surface on this 


From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
Yadiel Sotomayor
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:28 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Coding for a new jaws accessible app

Thanks for mentioning it Bill! How about google chrome. I love that browser, 
but I cannot use it with jaws only with N***. So it will be nice tho have that 
option. Also, how about opera if google is not an option. That would be great.

From: Bob W <mailto:rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx>  
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 6:48 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Re: Coding for a new jaws accessible app

Peter, here's my thinking and I hope others will correct me if I'm wrong.
A website is not an application. 
the applications involved would be your browser--i.e. or firefox, or chrome.
For that matter, google docs would not be an application either.
Just my  thoughts.

A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing 
you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams  

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Peter  <mailto:peterholdstock@xxxxxxx> Holdstock 
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: Coding for a new jaws accessible app

Hi, for many blind people dating is quite difficult and many dating websites 
don’t seem too accessible, and I have seen a few posts from people trying to 
get various websites working. I’d be very grateful if the website was made accessible in some way. It is pretty accessible 
at the mom            ent so shouldn’t require too much work, but there are a 
lot of extra links and information you have to try and bypass to get to the 
useful stuff.
I may be the only one who wants that website accessible, but I hope not and I 
think lots would benefit from a fully accessible dating site where it’s not 
just disabled people.
From: John  <mailto:johnrobertmartyn@xxxxxxxxx> Martyn 
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 8:33 AM
To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; jaws-users-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: Coding for a new jaws accessible app
Hi folks,
As my 32nd birthday approaches, I think I am going to make a habit of picking 
one new application per year to make jaws accessible. Picking Rhapsody was not 
an easy task, but it taught me many things about an application that seems next 
to impossible to make behave. I am taking off this summer from school and will 
have the time to code a new application. Rhapsody Blind was a test to see if I 
could pull it off, and it worked. I selfishly chose the first one, now I'm 
looking for the popular vote on what you might want. I probably won't start 
until this semester is over at the end of May, so this gives plenty of time to 
decide. It would be a good idea to chat among each other and find out what is 
needed or just plain want for entertainment purposes. So, let's open up the 
floor and hear some suggestions.
John Martyn

Yadiel J. Sotomayor
E-MAIL: yadosotomayor@xxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: