As stated earlier, I would like to see a more accessible version of itunes. ----- Original Message ----- From: John Martyn To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 7:25 PM Subject: Re: Coding for a new jaws accessible app Wow, you made a good point. I have been hearing much talk about google docs lately. One thing about google docs is that I can still use the jaws cursor. Rhapsody Blind operates heavily on the jaws cursor because nothing is PC cursor friendly. I would have to investigate google docs to see what it lets you get away with. Very good suggestion. I have MS office 2002, 2007, and 2010 myself and though I get it free for school purposes, it is not cheap. Something that benefits us all would be the right direction. I would consider myself an intermediate script writer right now, but finding a way to do something is my talent. Eventually, I am going to organize a scripting site to help develop others in making more applications accessible. For now, it's gaining the knowledge and experience to share this valuable information. Even though google docs might be difficult, the one thing I have on my side is experience with script writing. I have spent hundreds of hours testing and playing with how jaws gets its information. Rhapsody Blind took so long because it was so difficult and because I had to learn how to accomplish it. I have only heard of google docs as being inaccessible and tried it myself just when I started getting better at scripting. My feeling on it is that it is possible. To help save some time, who knows what all google docs is possible of doing? ----- Original Message ----- From: Marquette, Ed To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 5:30 AM Subject: RE: Coding for a new jaws accessible app OK. This "coding for an application" raises a good point. Indeed, Internet Explorer, FireFox, and the like are applications; however, Websites have progressed well beyond what we think of as traditional Websites. More and more, I'm seeing applications migrate away from the client/server model, where something is installed on a local PC, to Web-based applications, where the application resides remotely and is only accessed through the browser. For instance, I use a Web application at my office which is a pretty sophisticated document management system. By that, I mean only a shadow of a Microsoft Office document resides on the local drive (and only for emergency back-up purposes). The real files are not even located on a remote server that our firm owns. Instead, they reside somewhere in a mountain cave in Utah. When I want to access, search for, or save a document, Internet Explorer runs a Web application that looks up or stores the document with a whole range of information (e.g., author, creation date, last edit date, client number, matter number, document name, type of law, type of document, and selected key words.). The look-up operates much like a Google search operates or, in the alternative, by field look-up. There are competitive applications, but they all operate on the client/server model. The point is that more and more of these Web applications are appearing. Fortunately, the one referenced above is pretty well behaved, particularly with JAWS and its quick keys, or whatever they are called. It does not, however, respond all that well to scripts. That, however, may be my ineptitude as a script writer, though the scripts I wrote were hardly more than macros, i.e., a series of keystrokes. I would certainly like to see an accomplished script writer tackle, or try to tackle, a Web application of general applicability. I cannot think of an application with more general applicability than Google Docs, but I do have my own selfish objectives that, in the interest of full disclosure, I need to reveal. Still, a free application that can be shared in a collaborative way with power that approaches Microsoft Office would be pretty important to lots of people. Google Docs is free. Microsoft Office doesn't come cheap. Google Docs, however, may simply be too great a challenge. After all, all the screen reader people seem to have given up on it. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jfw-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob W Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 5:48 AM To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Coding for a new jaws accessible app Peter, here's my thinking and I hope others will correct me if I'm wrong. A website is not an application. the applications involved would be your browser--i.e. or firefox, or chrome. For that matter, google docs would not be an application either. Just my thoughts. Bob A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' Douglas Adams ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Holdstock To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 5:06 AM Subject: Re: Coding for a new jaws accessible app Hi, for many blind people dating is quite difficult and many dating websites don’t seem too accessible, and I have seen a few posts from people trying to get various websites working. I’d be very grateful if the website www.plentyoffish.com was made accessible in some way. It is pretty accessible at the mom ent so shouldn’t require too much work, but there are a lot of extra links and information you have to try and bypass to get to the useful stuff. I may be the only one who wants that website accessible, but I hope not and I think lots would benefit from a fully accessible dating site where it’s not just disabled people. Peter Thanks. Peter From: John Martyn Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 8:33 AM To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ; jaws-users-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Coding for a new jaws accessible app Hi folks, As my 32nd birthday approaches, I think I am going to make a habit of picking one new application per year to make jaws accessible. Picking Rhapsody was not an easy task, but it taught me many things about an application that seems next to impossible to make behave. I am taking off this summer from school and will have the time to code a new application. Rhapsody Blind was a test to see if I could pull it off, and it worked. I selfishly chose the first one, now I'm looking for the popular vote on what you might want. I probably won't start until this semester is over at the end of May, so this gives plenty of time to decide. It would be a good idea to chat among each other and find out what is needed or just plain want for entertainment purposes. So, let's open up the floor and hear some suggestions. Thanks, John Martyn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ANY FEDERAL TAX ADVICE CONTAINED IN THIS MESSAGE SHOULD NOT BE USED OR REFERRED TO IN THE PROMOTING, MARKETING OR RECOMMENDING OF ANY ENTITY, INVESTMENT PLAN OR ARRANGEMENT, AND SUCH ADVICE IS NOT INTENDED OR WRITTEN TO BE USED, AND CANNOT BE USED, BY A TAXPAYER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AVOIDING PENALTIES UNDER THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- This E-mail message is confidential, is intended only for the named recipient(s) above and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or otherwise protected by applicable law. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender at 402-346-6000 and delete this E-mail message. Thank you. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------