On 9/27/05, Thomas W Shinder <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'll elaborate. I admire your sense of humour; both you and Jim. Seriously. > That advice is wrong. OK, you have a lot of merit and knowledge to make such statements, however, can you please humour me this time - or if you have already, point me to one of your posts stating why Microsoft's advice is wrong in this case. > The rest is just words. Ouch... I feel sorry for the author. :) > HTH, It was compelling, but I was hoping that I was not going to have to assume my aforementioned scenario #3 was the best route to take? "3) Install 2004 as a member server of the 2000 production domain, somehow point the clients to the new ISA server, retire the old ISA 2000 trust, forest, and server." Cheers, ...D