[huskerlug] Re: A 100 watt laptop requires 960 lbs of coal per year!
- From: "John Moran" <bugs.moran@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: huskerlug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:28:38 -0500
http://www.iceagenow.com/Growing_Glaciers.htm
More evidence for you to ignore.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 9:27 AM, Joseph Smith <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> that was a late night post and done in haste (referring to the
> grammar)... though that doesn't change my opinion of you. At least tw
> tries to make valid points. Pointing out that ice melts in the summer
> and freeze in the winter doesn't contribute anything to the discussion.
>
> you're right though, it should have read "you're a fucking idiot".
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 19, 2008, at 9:20 AM, John Moran wrote:
>
> > That should be "you're" a contraction for you are, not "your", a
> > possessive. Also, there should be an indefinite article ("a") before
> > your adjective ("f-ing"). I am not a prude by ANY stretch, but when
> > you post garbage like this, complete with gratuitous profanity, you do
> > a better job of discrediting yourself that I can. Don't drink and
> > post.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Joseph Smith <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >> glacier ice that has been frozen for over 100,000 years? entire ice
> >> shelves disappearing?
> >>
> >>
> >> do you even read the news?
> >>
> >> I hate it when it comes to this.. .but, your fucking idiot.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:48 PM, John Moran wrote:
> >>
> >>> Okay, here goes - glaciers melt when it gets above freezing. It
> >>> gets
> >>> above freezing a lot in the spring, summer, and fall.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Joseph Smith <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> so, I guess the answer to my question is no.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 18, 2008, at 6:33 PM, John Moran wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "anyone out there that isn't a conspiracy theorist??"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wish I could believe you said that ironically. The guy on Al
> >>>>> Gore's
> >>>>> side asking for rational allies?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries
> >>>>> recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the
> >>>>> so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These
> >>>>> scientists,
> >>>>> many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC
> >>>>> (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the
> >>>>> climate
> >>>>> claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore. "
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?
> >>>>> FuseAction=Minority.SenateReport
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Joseph Smith
> >>>>> <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> They call themselves "Self described scientists". If your going
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> post links to anti-global warming "evidence", the least you could
> >>>>>> do
> >>>>>> is find information compiled by *real* scientists This SOB
> >>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>> even believe in natural selection, less evolution.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'll ask again-- one of these bunk scientists has yet to give a
> >>>>>> satisfactory explanation for why 100,000 year old glaciers are
> >>>>>> melting
> >>>>>> away before our eyes.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> give me a break.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> anyone out there that isn't a conspiracy theorist??
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -Joe
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 18, 2008, at 4:19 PM, GreyGeek wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> tw wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Sorry Joseph,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Since 2003, the first year that network from my link was put in
> >>>>>>>> place
> >>>>>>>> temperatures are dropping. It's mostly bunk science and
> >>>>>>>> politically
> >>>>>>>> motivated at best. I mean, you can disagree with that all you
> >>>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>> you're parroting the lines that people have used for the past
> >>>>>>>> hundred
> >>>>>>>> years to 'prove' their claims of both disastrous global warming
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> cooling. None of their claims have come true yet. There's a
> >>>>>>>> reason for
> >>>>>>>> that.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.oism.org/pproject/GWReview_OISM600.pdf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----
> >>>>>>> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-
> >>>>>>> request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ----
> >>>>>> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----
> >>>>> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ----
> >>>> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> >>>> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ----
> >>> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> >>> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> >> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ----
> > Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> > To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
> >
> >
>
>
> ----
> Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
>
>
>
----
Husker Linux Users Group mailing list
To unsubscribe, send a message to huskerlug-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of UNSUBSCRIBE
Other related posts:
