[openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
- From: "Rob Tijssen" <rob.tijssen@xxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 23:44:45 +0100
Hello Ingo,
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Namens Ingo Weinhold
>Verzonden: woensdag 20 december 2006 18:56
>Aan: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Onderwerp: [openbeos] Re: openbeos Digest V6 #253
>
>
>On 2006-12-20 at 16:27:57 [+0100], Philippe Houdoin
><philippe.houdoin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Axel replied:
>>
>> > "Michael Pfeiffer" <michael.pfeiffer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> IIRC the node in the trash contains an attribute that points to the
>> >> folder
>> >> where it originated from (used by restore/undelete).
>> >
>> > Damn, right, that was even an OpenTracker feature :-)
>> > Okay, then it deserves a BEntry method even more :)
>>
>> Does the Storage Kit have any notion of "Trash" already, beside
>> find_directory()?
>
>AFAIK it doesn't.
>
>> Or only the Tracker Kit provide this *feature*? Isn't the Tracker the one
>> who
>> create the trash folder in any BFS volume newly mounted?
>
>Yep.
>
>> Anyway, we should try to avoid spreading Trash *feature* implementation
>over
>> several components, don't you think?
>
>Yep, we should probably move it to libbe and simply let Tracker make use of
>it. The only drawback -- if you want to consider it as one -- is that other
>applications that would formerly use Tracker scripting thus circumvent the
>Tracker Undo/Redo feature. Unless we add a notification mechanism, that
>allows the Tracker to get notice.
Shouldn't the libbe also make the undo/redo feature available and let it be
used by tracker (like the thrash mentioned above), or doesn't it make any
sense to you guys :-) (I'm no coder just a lurker ;-))
Greeting, Rob
>CU, Ingo
--
Mijn Postvak In wordt beschermd door SPAMfighter.
479 spam-mails zijn er tot op heden geblokkeerd.
Download de gratis SPAMfighter via deze link: http://www.spamfighter.com/pro
Other related posts:
