Yes, I do understand the difference between the /dev device of the disc and the file system that is on it. If you read my last post I did mention that the UDF file system access and the dvd decoding via a bit stream are both possible, just two different points of view. I just know how it was done via the bitstream and when I asked 'what about the file system, don't we need a file system driver', the engineer replied "nope.. the dvd is read directly as a bitstream, no need for a file system driver" Whether or not the UDF file system is part of that, encompasses that, or is a seperate entity that points to a bitstream on the DVD.. I don't know. (obviously it does point/wrap/encompass the data somehow as the vob files are the a/v streams) I didn't have the time to read through the 3-4 MPEG standards manuals. I just know the entire decoding process (not just the movie, the menu and options as well) is done as a bitstream. example, I copied the first 100 MB of a DVD to a file via the dd command, the dvd decoder I was using (beta/experimental/no longer available to me) could play it just fine.. at least till it hit the 100MB mark. Now try to do the same with a BFS partition.. dd the first 100 MB of the partition to a file and try to mount and use it, no go. It's not designed to work like that. DVDs are. What's my point? UDF, or more correctly put.. a UDF file system driver, is not needed to play a DVD. end of soapbox, no more replies from me on this. -jtarbox ----- Original Message ----- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx> To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:12 AM Subject: [openbeos] Re: ISO-9660 BFS filesystem extension That doesn't mean it doesn't parse the UDF data to jump to the first .vob file data... Anyway the filesystem is not in the /dev/... driver, it is _in_ the data you copy from it. (or developpers are getting more and more weird :)) That's why you can dd a bfs partition to foo.img and do things like mkdir /foo mount /boot/home/foo.img /foo En réponse à Jonathan Tarbox <jtarbox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Well.. whether or not UDF is used on the disc, the DVD decoding is done > as a > bit stream.. I have seen the source code, read a little of the > official > standards book (wow, two pages worth of it and I got a headache) Just > going > by what I saw.. Terminator running with overlay support within BeOS > > -jtarbox > > > > that's a personal opinion).. but most DVD decoders don't even use > it. a > > DVD > > > usually is read as a raw bit stream from the device. it's quite > > interesting > > > reading, don't member the full details, but I'm not even sure what > udf > on > > a > > > dvd is used for.. prolly optional stuff.. /shrug > > > > not true. it's required of all DVD players to read basic UDF. > > it's part of the standard. > > > > you can check out section 6.9 of the UDF2.00 specs (it's probably > > a different number in other versions) > > > > "DVD-ROM discs shall be mastered with the UDF file system" > > ... > > "DVD-Video players expect media in UDF 1.02 format." > > ... > > "A DVD player shall only support UDF and not ISO 9660." > > > > > > more importantly on this discussion... > > > > "Note: The disc may also include the ISO 9660 file system. If the > disc > > contains both UDF and ISO 9660 file systems it shall be known as a > UDF > > Bridge disc. This UDF Bridge disc will allow playing DVD-ROM media > in > > computers which may only support ISO 9660. As UDF computer > implementations > > are provided, the need for ISO 9660 will disappear, and future discs > should > > contain only UDF." > > > > > > > > -soco > > > > > > > > >