On 1/17/07, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yeesh. Sometimes I can't even write a complete thought. What a meant > was that all that we really have is Zip, and while there are some > things package-related in the works for R2, I can't help but wonder > if > it needs to be sooner than that. Yes, but since it will take a long time until we may have settled on a feature set and the specifics, I would argue it makes a lot of sense to just adopt SoftwareValet packages for now, and have something better * after* R1.
Didn't we want to have app bundles for R2 (and packages for complex installs)?
We should concentrate to finish R1, and don't add more and more requirements to it.
100% agreed. Bye, Waldemar Kornewald
