> 2008/9/6 Michael Lotz <mmlr@xxxxxxxx>: > > > > As said by others, the webacm is UVC. But please note that it is > > probalby a device using isochronous USB transfers which are not > > really > > tested for UHCI and not implemented for EHCI. So really I would > > like to > > suggest going with ACPI or wireless first. I will eventually get > > isochronous support going for EHCI, but it's a bit involved to > > support > > it correctly as isochronous transfers are far less straight forward > > to > > implement. > > Actually IMHO I think this could be a good reason to go ahead with > UVC > support. > Isochronous support hasn't been really tested due to lack of drivers > for > devices > that actually use this transfer mode. And I really never tried much to support other webcams than mine due to lack of iso support :D chicken and egg... François.