2008/9/6 Michael Lotz <mmlr@xxxxxxxx>: > > As said by others, the webacm is UVC. But please note that it is > probalby a device using isochronous USB transfers which are not really > tested for UHCI and not implemented for EHCI. So really I would like to > suggest going with ACPI or wireless first. I will eventually get > isochronous support going for EHCI, but it's a bit involved to support > it correctly as isochronous transfers are far less straight forward to > implement. Actually IMHO I think this could be a good reason to go ahead with UVC support. Isochronous support hasn't been really tested due to lack of drivers for devices that actually use this transfer mode. Regards, -- Salvatore Benedetto (a.k.a. emitrax) Student of Computer Engineer University of Pisa www.haiku-os.it