On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 08:14 +0200, Stephan Assmus wrote: > Jorge G. Mare wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 23:35 +0200, François Revol wrote: > > > > > You might want to try using files for events as well, and use > > > > > indexed > > > > > attributes, but it might not scale very well... > > > > > > > > Using files with attributes would be nice, but is there a standard set > > > > of attributes for event files that all apps can comply with (and thus > > > > avoid different apps using different attributes for the same purpose)? > > > > > > There are some existing apps, but I don't think they are widely used. > > > > I am curious: would it be beyond the scope of this kind of project to > > propose a standard set of BFS attributes for event files? > > A meeting like you discussed later is nice. However, a lot of systems came > to BeOS and the good ones set the standards which others followed. (Even > the Translation Kit is such an assimilated system). That would most likely lead to different apps using a different set of attributes, creating unnecessary duplication which can become quite messy in the end. Can't remember the specifics, but I recall seeing this sort of thing back in the Zeta days, and it was not pretty from a user POV. IOW, I am of the opinion that consistency would be very beneficial for the end user, which is what should matter after all. :) Cheers, Koki