If you are in north America, and your receiver is WAAS capable, and your receiver has had a fix for 5 minutes or longer, then you should be able to assume you've got 3 meter accuracy. It won't always be the case, but there's a way for the GPS to tell you how likely it is that you do have 3 meter accuracy at the moment (it's called the HDOP, or horizontal dilution of position). I don't know if the Sendaro product uses this number when their software gives you an estimate of your fix quality, but if they do then you would have a way at least of knowing how much to trust your unit at that moment. This number is kind of like a measurement of uncertainty as to the position report being given. Chip =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=20 > [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lazzaro > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 2:18 PM > To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: THe earthmate: >=20 > If we could reliably get 3 meter accuracy, I could live with that.=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chip Orange > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 9:11 AM > To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: THe earthmate: >=20 >=20 > I have to ask though, isn't 3 meter accuracy good enough? =20 > Or, if you're not in north America, I guess it's 15 meter=20 > accuracy for the moment, although that will change in Europe soon. >=20 > Like I said, this kind of esoteric question really should be=20 > asked on the news groups I mentioned; perhaps someone there=20 > will know more. >=20 > Hth, >=20 > Chip >=20 > =3D20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=3D20 > > [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lazzaro > > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 6:46 PM > > To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: THe earthmate: > >=3D20 > > I was under the impression, perhaps mistakenly, that there=3D20 = were=20 > >professional portable GPS receivers that might increase=3D20 the=20 > >accuracy of the system. =3D20 =3D20 -----Original Message----- > > From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chip Orange > > Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 8:48 AM > > To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: THe earthmate: > >=3D20 > >=3D20 > > This is the kind of question that belongs on the news groups=3D20 =20 > >alt.satellite.gps and sci.geo.satellite-nav. > >=3D20 > > My understanding that what you're refering to as a "pro" unit=3D20 =20 > >costs many thousands of dollars, and must remain=20 > stationary=3D20 in one=20 > >place for a very long period of time to get a very=3D20 =20 > accurate fix. I=20 > >think they may require the deployment of=3D20 multiple=20 > antennas as well. =20 > >It's nothing that really would=3D20 apply to us and our needs here. > >=3D20 > > Most of the time, with WAAS working (which does take up to 5=3D20 =20 > >minutes after starting the receiver, and is currently only=20 > in=3D20 north=20 > >america) the accuracy is less than 3 meters. It's not=3D20 likely=20 > >you'll need more accuracy than that, so what would you=3D20 =20 > want out of=20 > >a "pro" unit that you're not getting at the moment? > >=3D20 > > The only other thing I can think of is that there are=20 > units=3D20 which=20 > >have accelerometers built-in as well, which they use as=3D20 =20 > part of a=20 > >"dead-reckoning" system for the times when they=3D20 lose the=20 > satellite=20 > >fix. > >=3D20 > > These are meant for people on the move, but again are many=3D20 =20 > >thousands of dollars. > >=3D20 > >=3D20 > >=3D20 > > Chip > >=3D20 > > =3D3D20 > >=3D20 > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=3D3D20 > > > [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of lazzaro > > > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 7:38 PM > > > To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: THe earthmate: > > >=3D3D20 > > > I'm interested in using other receivers because we'd like=20 > to=3D3D20=3D20 >=20 > > >explore so called pro units. We're not even sure if the=3D20 > > pro=3D3D20 models=3D20 > > >have higher accuracy. Is there a site that compares=3D3D20 = the=3D20 > > efficiency=3D20 > > >of GPS receivers so one can do a comparison? =3D3D20 =3D3D20 =3D > -----Original=3D20 > > >Message----- > > > From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of=20 > Chip Orange > > > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 4:01 PM > > > To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: THe earthmate: > > >=3D3D20 > > >=3D3D20 > > > Mike will have to answer that one; my guess is that they = are=3D3D20=20 > > >=3D20 giving some special initialization command to the=3D20 > > SportTrack=3D3D20 that=3D20 > > >they don't give to any other model. > > >=3D3D20 > > > While the BN may work with any GPS receiver, Sendaro=20 > would be=3D3D20=20 > > >=3D20 taking on a lot of extra support issues if they made=20 > that=3D3D20=3D20 > > claim. =3D20 > > >The earthMate is particularly easy for a blind person=3D3D20 = to=3D20 > > deal with,=3D20 > > >but I bet there are models out there which aren't. > > >=3D3D20 > > > If I were buying a receiver to go with the BN product, = I=3D3D20=3D20 > > wouldn't=3D20 > > >buy anything other than what Sendaro recommended=3D3D20 =20 > without a very >=20 > > >=3D >=20 > > >strong reason; and I would do it with the=3D3D20 = understanding=3D20 > > that I may=3D20 > > >run into issues that are difficult=3D3D20 to deal with.=20 > =3D3D3D20 =3D3D20 >=20 > > >=3D > That=3D20 > > >being said, maybe you've got a good enough reason so=3D3D20 =20 > that armed >=20 > > >=3D >=20 > > >with the knowledge that all GPS receivers output=3D3D20 the=20 > same data, >=20 > > >=3D >=20 > > >you'd be willing to try one for some special=3D3D20 reason. =3D20 > > For instance,=3D20 > > >you may want to share one with a=3D3D20 sighted spouse, so the=20 > > >spouse=3D20 picks it out for its nice color=3D3D20 display=20 > and maps or=20 > > >some other=3D20 reason. =3D3D20 Hth, =3D3D20 Chip =3D3D20 = =3D3D3D20 =3D3D20 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=3D3D3D20 > > > > [mailto:gps-talkusers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of=3D3D20 > > > joe j lazzaro > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 4:22 PM > > > > To: gps-talkusers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: [gps-talkusers] Re: THe earthmate: > > > >=3D3D3D20 > > > > If the Sendero/Humanware BrailleNote GPS system is=3D3D20 > > > compatable=3D3D3D20 with > > >=3D3D20 > > > >other receivers, I'm wondering why there are only=20 > two=3D3D3D20 =3D3D20 > > > listed on the > > >=3D3D20 > > > >menu? If I were to use another unit not listed=3D3D3D20 =20 > on the=3D3D20 > > > menu, which=3D3D20 > > > >receiver should this be set to? =3D3D3D20 =3D3D3D20 Joseph=20 > J. Lazzaro=20 > > > >=3D > =3D3D20=3D20 > > > >HTTP://JoeLazzaro.Com =3D3D3D20 =3D3D3D20 =3D3D3D20 =3D3D3D20 > > >=3D3D20 > > >=3D3D20 > > >=3D3D20 > >=3D20 > >=3D20 > >=3D20 >=20 >=20 >=20