[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place

  • From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 10:23:19 +0100

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 04:15:38PM +1200, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> Yeah, the more I think about it...the more i agree with you about
> process-in-place.
> * It's a significant performance gain.
> * It's applicable to a large number of plugins.
> 
> The performance gain comes though reducing our use of memory bandwith, and
> we hit the cache less.

Both of those are true, but ther performance gain comes because it saves
the host a buffer copy in certain situations.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. gmpi
  3. Archive
  4. 05-2003