[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place

  • From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 12:36:43 +0200

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Harris" <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 12:16 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place


> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:15:41 +0200, Vincent Burel wrote:
> > just some points  :
> >
> > first , i would like that we change the term "inplace/repace" by more
> > explicit and less ambigus term , personnally i always confused with
that.
>
> inplace is not the same as adding / replace.
>
> inplace means that some of your output buffers may be the same as some of
> your input buffers.
>
> ie. you cant write to output[i] before your do all your reads from
> input[i].

if you want. Personnally i know 3 SDK where inplace/replace has not exactely
the same property, and it seems too that everybody has it's own definition.
That's why i did the remark.

Vincent Burel


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. gmpi
  3. Archive
  4. 05-2003