[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 08:02:18 +0100

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:42:49 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
[inplace processing]

> I keep saying 'baton-passing' and no one says no, but no one seems to give
> it any heed, either.  It's a DIFFERENT idea, but I think it is a GOOD idea.
> It leaves optimizations to the plugin.

People have said no, I think your reaing a differnt discussion ;)

The plugin does not know the criteria for optimisation, so it can't decide
when it should do inplace and when not.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place
  - From: Tim Hockin
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place
  - From: Bill Gardner

References:
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place
  - From: David Olofson
- [gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place
  - From: Tim Hockin

[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place

Other related posts: