[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging, Process-In-Place

  • From: David Olofson <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 10:49:22 +0200

On Wednesday 28 May 2003 06.15, Jeff McClintock wrote:
[...]
> Other questions:
> Does process-in-place apply to:
> A) all a plugin's pins?.....or
> B) specify buffer sharing at granularity of individual pin pairs?
>
> B is more powerfull, but I guess option-A would be fine for most
> plugins. (gotta ignore those seductive 'corner cases'.....sirens
> luring us toward the rocks!......)

The question is if there are (under existing APIs), or will be, enough 
multichannel plugins that they don't count as corner cases.


//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate

.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`-----------------------------------> http://audiality.org -'
   --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. gmpi
  3. Archive
  4. 05-2003