[gmpi] Re: Topic 7: Audio packaging
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:46:11 +0100
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 12:39:39 +0200, David Olofson wrote:
> Anyway, yes, we should use different flags for "silent buffer" and "no
> connection". Some plugins might save lots of cycles in process() by
> setting up the internals properly at connection time, but they may
> not be able to reevaluate that for every process() call. Other
> plugins may, as has been suggested before, have special ideas about
> what "no connection" means, which are not compatible with the idea of
> silent buffers in the input streams.
Oh dear. I really dont want to rrake over the old magic silence arguments,
I /realy/ dont think its a good idea, its just a haven for bugs and
unpredicatable behaviour.
Flagging connected/unconected is fine by me, silence detection is not.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
