[gmpi] Re: Instruments done, moving on to "Plugin Files"

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: GMPI list <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 09:03:43 +0100

On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:24:38AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> Instruments is done:
> http://www.gmpi-plugins.org/gmpi/requirements.php#sec_3.16
> 
> Time for Plugin Files:
> http://www.gmpi-plugins.org/gmpi/requirements.php#sec_3.17

Looks fine to me, but we carefully step round mentioning packaging
formats, not even a for-instance which makes the text a bit cumbersome
IMHO.

I've done a little bit of experiemntation and the most
convienient/appropriate packaging format I found is jar:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jar/ (just a dressed up zipfile
really). It can be unpacked in-memory, signed etc. so its probably worth
mentioning as an example.

- Steve

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Follow-Ups:
- [gmpi] Re: Instruments done, moving on to "Plugin Files"
  - From: Tim Hockin

References:
- [gmpi] Instruments done, moving on to "Plugin Files"
  - From: Tim Hockin

[gmpi] Re: Instruments done, moving on to "Plugin Files"

Other related posts: