[gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
- From: "Vincent Burel" <vincent.burel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:36:19 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Hockin" <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 5:41 PM
Subject: [gmpi] Re: Decision time: 7.2
> I know I've been a pain int the ass about a lot of these, but it's just
> because I want to see this work. As it is, it seems to be going the other
> way. No one wants to argue for the best ideas.
>
> I'm, of course, willing to go by popular majority, but I'd rather see some
> form of consensus, even begrudged.
here is my wanting :
Plug-in recieves.
"n" buffer pointers for input.
"m" buffer pointers for output.
"n" can be different from "m".
"n" can be zero.
"m" can be zero.
inputbufferpointers are all different.
inputbufferpointers are never null
Outputbufferpointers are all different.
Outputbufferpointers are never null
inputbufferpointer[i] can be egal to Outputbufferpointer[i]
Regards
Vincent Burel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
