[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Inter-parameter linkages
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 22:50:09 +0100
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 06:19:34 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 01:44:32PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:31:44 -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> > > Motorized controllers are a UI. Endless rotary knobs with leds all around
> > > (like Nord 3 :) are a UI. a GUI is a UI. All are the same. They need to
> > > be notified when the value they represent changes. One of the biggest
> > > annoyances in standard MIDI knobs is when the knob and the soft param are
> > > not in sync. Yuck.
> > >
> > > I think we're saying the same thing here, aren't we?
> >
> > Yes. I think the important point is that modorised controllers do not
> > require DSP plugins to be able to publish changes to thier inputs.
>
> No, they require feedback. We've already established that this is true.
> And I *thought* we had made use cases for parameters that are controlled by
> the DSP engine, but you keep skipping over that.
*output* parametes, yes. I've not seen a case for plugins controling thier
inouts yet. I've I've missed it please give the URL in the archives of
somewhere one is mentioned.
We've had:
parameters that change the range of other parameters (not relevent, but
still hard)
morph (I dont think changing inputs helps there)
randomisation (ditto)
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
