[geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth? supplemental

  • From: Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 21:02:12 +0000

If it's Russian then wow, very distant language from English, from the Balto-Slavic family with the cyrillic writing system as opposed to the Germanic, Anglo–Frisian family with Latin writing.


Neville Jones wrote:
Dear Jack,

I don't know what Allen's native language is, but certainly he (and Regner, whose native language is Danish) does a remarkable job of explaining technical concepts to us in our language.

Faced with spelling and grammatical errors, or trying to explain all this in Russian, for example, I think I'll stick to ... er, hang on, let me think about that.


www.GeocentricUniverse.com <http://www.GeocentricUniverse.com>

    -----Original Message-----
    *From:* jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    *Sent:* Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:42:02 -0000
    *To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    *Subject:* [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth? supplemental

    Dear Allen,
    I have to agree with Neville:-)
    It was the drawing rather than your explanation that I grasped. I
    really do find it exceedingly difficult to follow your
    explanations. I guess you are writing in the way that you tend to

        ----- Original Message -----
        *From:* Neville Jones <mailto:njones@xxxxxxxxx>
        *To:* geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        *Sent:* Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:22 PM
        *Subject:* [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth? supplemental

        "As clear as mud  :-)  "  - Allen

        I think we can ALL agree on that comment.

        www.GeocentricUniverse.com <http://www.GeocentricUniverse.com>

            -----Original Message-----
            *From:* allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
            *Sent:* Thu, 15 Nov 2007 09:13:08 -0800 (PST)

            I attached a all new diagram here....After you see this
            diagram, take a look and let me know if you understand my
            answer now......I did answer you question .._*NO*_ then i
            expalined why but I don’t think the answer was understood
            ......This diagram should make it clear as mud...?
            :-)...especially if you reread the first part of what I
            wrote, i have included it here in this post.....

Other related posts: