[geocentrism] Re: Celestial Poles
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:38:44 +1100
Most appreciated.
Best wishes,
Regner
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> Dear Regner,
>
> You are clearly a scholar and a gentleman.
>
> (Or should that be, a gentleman and a scholar? Perhaps they are equivalent?
> Let's not start that again!)
>
> On a serious note, I greatly appreciate your comments.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neville
> www.GeocentricUniverse.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: art@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:18:13 +1100
>
> Dear Neville,
>
> What a pleasant surprise - And a very graceful end to this part of our
> discussion - We'll see whether I succeed to convince Allen.
>
> I very much appreciate that you took the time for mindful consideration of
> the topic. If we all followed your example, we could probably save a lot
> of time and frustrations. I, for one, have been too rash a few times.
>
> I'm looking forward to, hopefully soon, go ahead with that list
> of top 5 points in support of a geocentric Universe.
> If anybody still wants to add entries, I think it'll still be a bit
> before we can close the "Celestial Poles" issue. And remember, that
> a HC claim that you find ludicrous and for which the only reasonable
> alternative is GC, also counts as a point in support of GC.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Regner
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
> Quoting Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I respected Regner's request not to immediately respond to his last
> posting,
> > but instead have been giving this whole matter very careful consideration.
> >
> > There is now no doubt in my mind that the 24-hour images about the ecliptic
> > polar axis are always going to be snapshots of the diurnal rotation in the
> > heliocentric model and I concede, therefore, that the celestial poles
> > argument does not disprove the heliocentric model.
> >
> > Steven and my web site will be amended in the near future, God willing, to
> > reflect this retraction.
> >
> > I would just like to thank you all for some excellent debating and for the
> > many illustrations that several of you have provided. I hope that none of
> you
> > feel that your efforts were either wasted or unappreciated.
> >
> > This topic will not be closed yet, since Allen has not had a chance to
> fully
> > digest Regner's post. If he concedes, as I have, then we will close it off,
> > otherwise he will now have one more to convince!
> >
> > I hope that our little forum family is strengthened by this discussion and
> > that each one of us has learnt something from it, I know that I have. If,
> > however, anyone feels disappointed, then I apologise to you for building
> your
> > hopes up.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Neville
> > www.GeocentricUniverse.com
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
