[GeoStL] Re: Cache ratings
- From: "Jim Bensman" <jbensman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:30:52 -0600
-
Only problem with that is many times there is more than one way to get to
the cache. I think the best way to do it is if there is more than a mile or
tow of hiking to let people know in the description.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bernie
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:23 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Cache ratings
>
>
> -
> Boy, I have a feeling this one might have been directed towards me. Here
> is my idea. Why not have a third set of stars? It would go something like
> this.
> 1 star under one mile
> 2 stars 1-2 mi
> 3 stars 2-5 mi
> 4 stars 5-10 mi
> 5 stars over 10 mi
> All of course would be round trip ratings. The Happy Kraut
>
>
>
>
> ******************************************************************
> **********
> Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
> Mail List Info.
> //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
> ******************************************************************
> **********
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List Info.
//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
****************************************************************************
Other related posts:
