Re: [foxboro] [foxboro]

  • From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 12:12:28 -0500

I've done something like this:
IN HF8
PRP RO01


The first line tells the CALCA block that you are interested in the first 
5 RInn inputs (F8 = 11111000).  The second line tells the block to 
propagate errors on any of those inputs to the specified output (RO01 in 
this case).  You can then set MBADOP on the PIDA appropriately, as someone 
already mentioned.


It has worked well enough in the applications I've used it for.


Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation






"Ron Schafer" <rschafer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
06/02/2008 10:10 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
[foxboro]






Hmmm....
So my latest problem is like this..
I have 5 ain blocks that feed a calca (RI01-RI05) and get summed and 
divided by five. This output is sent to a PIDA as the Meas. The process 
eng wants the block to go to manual if any transmitter goes to a bad 
status.
I thought I could "OR" the blksta from the ain blocks and send it to the 
pida's bad status bit along with mbad in the PIDA. Does anyone know how to 
connect bcalci bad status or have a better solution?
 
 
 



 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: