Thanks, Sven. Will you please do that. Obviously, the description is inadequate. Regards, Alex Johnson Invensys Systems, Inc. 10707 Haddington Houston, TX 77063 +1 713 722 2859 (voice) +1 713 932 0222 (fax) +1 713 722 2700 (switchboard) alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx I hope to see you at the Invensys Process System User Group meeting October 3-6 in Houston, TX - www.invensys.com/usergroup2005 -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Audenaert, Sven Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 5:38 AM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] CP60 new image problem Alex, I was the service engineer who installed the latest CP60 image by installing QF 1005621. > I haven't searched the user notes for the QF that you have, > but it should mention the warning message. Would you mind > checking for me? RE: I have searched the user notes and this it wat is says: PLB Block Duplicate Output Connection Check added ================================================ CAR:1002747 - Perform duplicate output checking for PLB Blocks 25449 There was no indication for duplicate output connections when two or more PLB blocks were connected to the same FBM. As a result, two different blocks were allowed to write to the same IFL in the ladder logic. Duplicate output checking for PLB blocks was added. So no indictation about the "W59 - DUPLICATE OUTPUT CHANNEL" warning. TAC suggested to enter a seperate CAR to report this issue and get it corrected. regards, Sven Audenaert Service Engineer Invensys Systems N.V./S.A. Kontichsesteenweg 54 2630 Aartselaar - Belgium T: +32 (0)3 205.14.45 F: +32 (0)3 232.17.98 sven.audenaert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - www.invensys-systems.be F o x b o r o * S i m S c i * T r i c o n e x * W o n d e r w a r e > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Johnson, > Alex P (IPS) > Sent: donderdag 8 september 2005 16:18 > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [foxboro] CP60 new image problem > > Dirk, > > Re: W59- duplicate output channel > > This is not an error message. It is a warning message that > attempts to alert the user that the potential exists that the > same output channel is/maybe in use by multiple blocks. > > This change was made in response to a problem originally > reported by CAR1002747. The CAR stated that there were > several cases of damaged equipment in the field caused by > multiple PLB blocks writing to the same contact output. > > This issue was taken to the Safety Committee. The committee > concluded that it was NOT a safety issue, since the user > documentation warned against the possibility of incorrect > behavior when multiple PLB blocks are connected to the same FBM. > > That said, the Safety Committee also strongly recommended > that a warning message be added to the I/A product in a > future release. In response to this recommendation, this was done. > > > I haven't searched the user notes for the QF that you have, > but it should mention the warning message. Would you mind > checking for me? > > > Please let me know if you have any other questions. > > Regards, > > Alex Johnson > Invensys Systems, Inc. > 10707 Haddington > Houston, TX 77063 > +1 713 722 2859 (voice) > +1 713 932 0222 (fax) > +1 713 722 2700 (switchboard) > alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > I hope to see you at the Invensys Process System User Group > meeting October > 3-6 in Houston, TX - > www.invensys.com/usergroup2005 > > -----Original Message----- > From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dirk Pauwels > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 2:36 AM > To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [foxboro] CP60 new image problem > > Does anyone outhere have FBM41 & 42 on CP60's? We do, and > have never experienced problems with it, now we re-imaged the > CP60, using QF1005621, and all of our PLB's which are on > FBM41 & 42 are showing in green in the select. Reason for > this seems to be the fact that if you use FBM41 with extender > FBM42, both plb's use the same iomid, the FBM42 doesn't have > it's own iomid. The plb's are working ok, but it's not > possible to change the config in the icc, we keep getting > error W59- duplicate output channel. So we cannot save the > changes. Therefore we cannot edit any of the PLB's concerned. > Is there any solution without changing back to the old image? > Seems Foxboro forgot about the Extender FBM42 in their new > image.... One way > > to edit the plb's seems to be to save the ladder logic in the > library, delete the plb and create it again, type in all the > ifl's, including the corrections/new ifl's and then copy the > logic from the library, edit and save. Any suggestions from > the Foxboro guru's? > > _________________________________________________________________ > Gratis bloggen op MSN Spaces http://spaces.msn.com/?mkt=nl-be > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > _________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by > Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use > the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read > http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: > //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > _________ > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by > Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use > the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read > http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html > > foxboro mailing list: > //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro > to subscribe: > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join > to unsubscribe: > mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave > > _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave