[dungeoncrawl] Re: Tonight

  • From: jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:41:41 US/Eastern

OK.  On another note, I forgot to talk 
about this last week - Mylena would ask 
Magnus for as much info as he could 
provide on the various members she's 
looking for.  Would he provide it?

> 
> Jim,
>     If we have the time tonight and 
you don't mind, I can take a look at
> Ambrosia and help you convert her.
>     John
> 
> jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > That's right.  By the way, I'm sort 
of
> > in the same boat as everyone else 
for
> > tonight - more prepared for the 
group
> > in the sewers, but more interested 
in
> > the higher level group.  We'll
> > definitely get back to the other 
group
> > no later than next time -
> >
> > >     Yes, Ambrosia is incorrect for
> > her levels (as is Karvas).  However,
> > > she does not have to give up any
> > prestige class levels.  She keeps 
the
> > > levels she has now, she just 
advances
> > a little differently.  Since her
> > > most recent levels are all lasher
> > levels, it would be in her best
> > > interest to convert.  She wouldn't
> > lose much of anything from her 
lasher
> > > class, and she would have access 
to
> > some kick ass new feats.
> > >
> > > jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > > Shouldn't be a problem - then
> > again, it
> > > > might be for Nadan.  We'll have 
to
> > see
> > > > (although we should be able to 
wing
> > it).
> > > >
> > > > Remind me on one thing - did 
you say
> > > > once that Ambrosia is written up
> > wrong
> > > > for "epic level" characters?  
She's
> > > > like 23rd level or something - 
does
> > > > that mean she needs to ditch 
some
> > > > prestige class levels?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     I don't quite have Magnus
> > > > finished (I need to pick an epic
> > feat),
> > > > and I
> > > > > haven't even begun to work on
> > raising
> > > > Nadan to epic levels.  Just as 
an
> > > > > FYI.
> > > > >
> > > > > Damon Kline wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > That makes sense and it 
seems
> > like
> > > > a good strategy.  I'm really 
looking
> > > > > > forward to this!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 
04,
> > 2002
> > > > 5:27 AM
> > > > > > To: 
dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re:
> > Tonight
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to find a way to 
give
> > > > everyone
> > > > > > at least one "higher level"
> > > > character
> > > > > > in a short period of time - 
I
> > think
> > > > > > that will be possible.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mylena plans on going for
> > characters
> > > > > > who are more "pragmatic" in
> > their
> > > > > > outlook first - like Quasit 
or
> > > > > > Carpathia - and then hoping 
to
> > gain
> > > > > > their assistance 
in "rescuing"
> > the
> > > > > > others.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think I'd prefer to 
stick
> > with
> > > > one
> > > > > > group for the entire night,
> > rather
> > > > than
> > > > > > > splitting it up.  I like 
the
> > idea
> > > > of
> > > > > > getting the 
Riders "unstuck",
> > but I
> > > > > > > also reiterate what John 
said
> > in
> > > > that
> > > > > > I would prefer not to sit
> > around for
> > > > > > > an hour waiting for 
Magnus to
> > > > figure
> > > > > > out a way to free up a 
character
> > > > for me
> > > > > > > to play.  This is 
obviously an
> > > > > > exaggeration, but you get my
> > > > meaning.
> > > > > > > Anyway, I'm psyched to 
play
> > > > whoever,
> > > > > > so here are my characters
> > > > alignments:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Baish:        Chaotic 
Neutral
> > > > > > > Dove:         Neutral Good
> > > > > > > Quasit:       Chaotic 
Neutral
> > > > (with
> > > > > > more good tendencies)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Jim and Karen
> > > > > > 
[mailto:jimkaren@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 
03,
> > 2002
> > > > > > 10:55 PM
> > > > > > > To: 
dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > > Subject: [dungeoncrawl]
> > Tonight
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Guys,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How was everyone's 
weekend?
> > We
> > > > had a
> > > > > > good one, but I didn't get 
the
> > time
> > > > I
> > > > > > > wanted to prepare for 
tonight.
> > > > > > Still, I feel confident to
> > continue.
> > > > > > One
> > > > > > > thing is worth discussing,
> > though.
> > > > > > Although I'd be glad to 
continue
> > > > where
> > > > > > > we left off last time, 
with
> > the
> > > > group
> > > > > > in the sewers beneath the 
Lower
> > > > Ward,
> > > > > > > I'd also be interested in
> > doing
> > > > some
> > > > > > work to retrieve the Riders
> > stuck on
> > > > > > > the outer planes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What is everyone's 
preference
> > > > > > tonight?  Stick with one of 
the
> > two
> > > > > > groups for
> > > > > > > the entire night, or split
> > things?
> > > > > > On another note, here's the 
list
> > > > that
> > > > > > > was sent around last week 
by
> > John.
> > > > > > Could everyone please let me
> > know
> > > > what
> > > > > > > their characters' 
alignments
> > are?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks -
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     Here's the list, 
broken
> > down
> > > > by
> > > > > > player:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt:
> > > > > > >     Carpathia
> > > > > > >     Foster
> > > > > > >     Gadget
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Keith:
> > > > > > >     Karvas
> > > > > > >     Nelik
> > > > > > >     Saurote
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Jim:
> > > > > > >     Ambrosia
> > > > > > >     Escrima
> > > > > > >     Marnie
> > > > > > >     Jack Knight
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Damon:
> > > > > > >     Baish
> > > > > > >     Dove
> > > > > > >     Quasit
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > John:
> > > > > > >     Faceous
> > > > > > >     Nadan
> > > > > > >     Zolkiir
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > NPCs:
> > > > > > >     Shelensia
> > > > > > >     Talosaard
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> 
> 
> 



Other related posts: