On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 09:00 -0500, Joe Lapp wrote: > > This goes clearly beyond the scope of an Wiki Engine. That's what forums > > are designed for. You should consider autolinking the wiki to a forum > > engine or something... > > I agree that the wikiness of a wiki engine isn't an ideal substrate for > discussion functionality, but I don't think it's fair to say that discussions > are beyond the scope of a wiki engine. > > Consider the number of independent discussions that exist on just the > DokuWiki wiki. Consider that it was important enough for Mediawiki to make > the feature available from every page (and that there's a discussion > happening on virtually every Mediawiki page). Even just in the abstract, the > idea of people collaborating to produce a common product requires easy > communication separately from the product; wikis virtually *require* > discussion forums. > > Perhaps if we don't want to build a thorough discussion solution on a wiki > substrate, we could provide out-of-the-box hooks for integrating DokuWiki > with one or more dedicated discussion engines. > > Besides, I think DokuWiki would be an easier sell if it had some form of > inherent discussion support. I personally bulk at recommending DokuWiki to > serve the city of Austin because of its absence, and yet I'm a hardcore > DokuWiki fan using DokuWiki for my own purposes. > i use dokuwiki because it isnt as big, and cluttered as stuff like media wiki.. i wouldnt like having stuff like discussion stuff and such.. its easy just to link to a phpbb forum.. > ~joe -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist