on 23/1/03 6:16 pm, Peter Ferries at PFerries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >=20 > I'm not sure why anyone would want to consider using an unapproved piping > material in any sprinkler system. Is the cost saving so great? The materi= al > content in the piping alone for a typical residential system is quite sma= ll, > and all of the approved materials are quite easy to install. In view of > this, why take the risk? >=20 > As a matter of interest, I'm not aware that any piping material has been > tested and/or approved for use on water mist systems. No doubt our water > mist system members will let me know if I'm wrong. >=20 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Residential Sprinkler Forum > Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/dd251 > WebSite: www.dd251.org.uk > To unsubscribe from the list, send an email to > dd251-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx with =93unsubscribe=94 in the Subject line or > unsubscribe from the website www.dd251.org.uk >=20 >=20 Think you missed the point of the question. With these particular joists, copper or rigid plastic cannot be used ===================================================================== Residential Sprinkler Forum Archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/dd251 WebSite: www.dd251.org.uk To unsubscribe from the list, send an email to dd251-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx with ?unsubscribe? in the Subject line or unsubscribe from the website www.dd251.org.uk