On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:27:17 +0100, David Pilling wrote: > In message <200806130120.22487.david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Boddie > <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes > > The non-linked text problem or the interoperability with Quark problem? > > Well both. I know I wrote OP so that you can't link two frames which both > contain text - what a stupid limitation... :-( > > I suppose you'll either have to choose another intermediate format that > > can keep the layout information > > That format being? Good question! If the publisher can accept the QXML format that Andy mentioned then maybe that's the way to go. > > Is there any chance the publisher can accept another format that Quark > > can import fairly reliably? > > Well yes. One reason I ask the question here is that it gives you a chance > to say what you'd like, if I'm going to do any work it might as well be > useful to everyone. Fair enough. You might find it useful to write an exporter to produce files in a custom XML-based format for OP documents. That way other people can struggle with the task of targeting specific file formats without disturbing you too much - or perhaps you like doing this kind of conversion work. :-) > You might know what works well with Quark, or what would be useful in > general. Actually, I don't, but your question made me go and check to see what formats (if any) Scribus can export to, but I didn't see anything of use. It also made me remember a demonstration of application automation I'd seen, involving a DTP package on Windows, but that approach would require that _you_ are running Quark (on a Mac, I presume) and I didn't want to suggest that. ;-) David To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: //www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling