T_T leave Fang alone...
Most likely end of March early April.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So when are you back here so I can beat on Fang?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:01:57 +0700
Thank you Nic for the charge advice. I can now kindda zone with Fang's
Playing a charge character is interesting. You got to remember to buffer
charge every now and then.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re:
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:44:27 +0000
I’ve given up on Ken. I do understand that it’s not all the character and
a lot of my failing to play him is just me not understanding the system
properly. Maybe once I’ve learned to play this game properly, I’ll go back
to Ken. For now, I’m trading him out for Ryu. I get to keep my hado and dp
as well as getting a crap load better normal. His MK makes me stupidly
Played some games against Paas. By Ken got his ass completely handed to
him. My Ryu got most of his ass handed to him. Seems like a definite
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
*Sent:* 26 February 2016 09:40 AM
*Subject:* Re: Re:
Similar to the genius of Capcom.
I realized that by decreasing the level of execution they have opened up
the game for more mind game possibilities.
im finding myself going more into defensive training mode, trying to
devise a plan around certain moves that give me problems instead of doing a
combo over and over.
It makes for a much better game experience, I like the direction they
took. The game is quite balanced
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 26 February 2016 07:35 AM
*Subject:* Re: Re:
But they lack long term perspective, so typical of this generation.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
Didn't Bill gates say something along the lines of how you should give
hard/tricky tasks to someone lazy, cos they will figure out the most
Those penguins are the smart ones
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by