Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:07:30 +0700
T_T leave Fang alone...
Most likely end of March early April.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So when are you back here so I can beat on Fang?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:01:57 +0700
Thank you Nic for the charge advice. I can now kindda zone with Fang's
Playing a charge character is interesting. You got to remember to buffer charge
every now and then.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Subject: RE: Re:
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 07:44:27 +0000
I’ve given up on Ken. I do understand that it’s not all the character and a lot
of my failing to play him is just me not understanding
the system properly. Maybe once I’ve learned to play this game properly, I’ll
go back to Ken. For now, I’m trading him out for Ryu. I get to keep my hado and
dp as well as getting a crap load better normal. His MK makes me stupidly happy.
Played some games against Paas. By Ken got his ass completely handed to him. My
Ryu got most of his ass handed to him. Seems like a
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
Sent: 26 February 2016 09:40 AM
Subject: Re: Re:
Similar to the genius of Capcom.
I realized that by decreasing the level of execution they have opened up the
game for more mind game possibilities.
im finding myself going more into defensive training mode, trying to devise a
plan around certain moves that give me problems instead of doing a combo over
It makes for a much better game experience, I like the direction they took. The
game is quite balanced
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 26 February 2016 07:35 AM
Subject: Re: Re:
But they lack long term perspective, so typical of this generation.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
Didn't Bill gates say something along the lines of how you should give
hard/tricky tasks to someone lazy, cos they will figure out the most efficient
Those penguins are the smart ones
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by