Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:55:09 +0200
Was it that bad dude?
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I wish I could have stayed up for the USF4 matches. UMvC3 matches made me
> want to commit suicide. When Scrubeks lost, I stopped watching and went to
> bed.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Who watched CEO? Some really crazy matches.
>>
>> You can find them here, but the titles contain spoilers
>> https://www.youtube.com/user/StreetFighterCentral/videos
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It's a rogue-like game, so actions only take place once you move. You
>>> have to keep moving forward because the Darkness chases you and once it
>>> catches up, you die. Every action you take causes the darkness to catch
>>> up, but you can move forward at a much faster rate than it can catch up.
>>>
>>> The (initial) goal is to beat the Demon Lord who shows up after 400km on
>>> normal difficulty (easy mode, I guess). He's stupidly tough and the odds
>>> of you beating him on your first run is basically zero. Here's the
>>> interesting bit: After every run you gain Hero Points which you can use to
>>> unlock perks and classes for your next run. You can also spend points on a
>>> Vault which you can use to store items from previous runs, so if you find a
>>> kick-ass sword you can save it there after you die and then it will be
>>> available on the next run.
>>>
>>> It's got a multiplayer mode but you don't really play with other
>>> people. You can just see the statuses of other people playing on the same
>>> map, and how far they've travelled. If someone gets killed by the Demon
>>> Lord, there's a chance you might run into them in ghost form. They drop
>>> useful items.
>>>
>>> It takes a while to get into it but it's one of those "just one more
>>> try" type of games.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It looks like fun, if the trailer is anything to go by :)
>>>>
>>>> How exactly does the gameplay work? Seems to be a action-rpg/turn-based
>>>> hybrid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That One Way Heroics game was totally worth it for R5. Must have
>>>>> played it about 50 times already.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:19 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I contributed about 20 gigs
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 11:10:42 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What are we going to do about soundproofing the place?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, nice work on dodging the original topic. HOKAGE?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 1:06 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> have it at jeeva's , theres enough room for everyone. just don't
>>>>>> sleepover that place can get cold at night.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:52:55 +0000
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We still have a couple of weeks left. I just don’t want to get to the
>>>>>> last minute and realise that I’ll be sitting at home watching it on
>>>>>> stream
>>>>>> with only Paas and my cats cheering.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I’m going to take Friday off and see if I can actually finish
>>>>>> all the Dangerous Dave games.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>>>>>> mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On
>>>>>> Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:48 PM
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wasn't able to find a suitable venue :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Truth be told, it hasn't been terribly high on my list of priorities
>>>>>> this past month, due to other pressing matters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh, doesn’t Hokage refer to a specific kage – the fire one? Then
>>>>>> you have raikage, misukage…
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think your question should’ve been ‘Who is the fifth Kage from Jhb?’
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On an unrelated note, we still don’t have a venue organised for the
>>>>>> Evo weekend, do we?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>>> *Sent:* 30 June 2014 12:14 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WHO IS THE 5TH HOKAGE FROM JOBURG
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:29:06 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks fer the words of wisdom Nic. Much appreciated :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't know that f+BD can hop over ground fireballs. That's really
>>>>>> cool. Makes sense but it definitely wasn't something I picked up on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll remember that df+A is good for anti-airing purposes. I've only
>>>>>> ever used it as a combo extender into argentine backbreaker *lol*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's very little to teach you then, you've got the just of it.
>>>>>> Your level up is strong.
>>>>>> Ummm.....
>>>>>> His EX gatling can be "free cancelled" into another special.
>>>>>> He can finish launch combos with an air throw, like Mai.
>>>>>> He can use the f+BD to hop over ground fireballs.
>>>>>> df+A is a "good" anti air.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...that's all I got.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 10:14, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've noticed :P I've actually been on the receiving end of it so I
>>>>>> know how effective it can be :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here's one of the throw setups I have (mid-screen):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Argentine Backbreaker (with qcf+C followup), f+BD into super hop j.B,
>>>>>> Argentine Backbreaker, rinse and repeat. It looks like Clark goes through
>>>>>> (or just slightly above) the opponent during j.B and ends up on the
>>>>>> opposite side.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The recovery from the j.B is so quick that it appears that Clark is
>>>>>> still airborne when the throw comes out. I can alternate between the B
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> D versions depending on the opponent's tendencies. Or I could just do
>>>>>> nothing and see what happens. Came across it by chance when I was messing
>>>>>> around with Clark's jumps and it seems to work quite well. Might have
>>>>>> limited application against a wary opponent but it should be quite
>>>>>> effective in the beginning :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have yet to explore all of his options but that will come with
>>>>>> time. I just need a functional Clark for now and I think I have that
>>>>>> *lol*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should add this then.
>>>>>> Standing CD
>>>>>> Just do it when your opponent has been floored.
>>>>>> It kills many wakeup attempts, and Clark is technically airborne
>>>>>> during it too. Then you can cancel it with a F+BD and put the fear of
>>>>>> god
>>>>>> into your opponent with 3 special throw mixups, an EX machinegun combo,
>>>>>> well pretty much all options he has.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:37, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LB sensei ftw *lol*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I put Clark on the team for two reasons: Damage and LB's hatred of
>>>>>> j.CD.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>>> LB with some good advice for a change.
>>>>>> Good stuff.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 09:28, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yup, that's the idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Iori is the battery for the team. I'm glad LB suggested I play him
>>>>>> because his confirms are really easy and lead to good damage. Ryo does ok
>>>>>> with 2-3 bars. Clark is an absolute monster with 5 and full drive meter.
>>>>>> His range is an issue but at that point I'm in gamble mode anyway. All I
>>>>>> really need to do is just land one hit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's a pretty good team strat actually.
>>>>>> Your team gets and more damage from 1st to last. But you have to get
>>>>>> closer to your opponent after each loss.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clark is a problem with meter. His range is an issue.
>>>>>> Ryo has good range and uses some meter.
>>>>>> EX Iori has great range and builds meter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30 Jun 2014 08:53, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah. On point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ryo second, Clark anchor.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:45 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you playing ex iori right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:39:31 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You should have told me to play Clark ages ago. I've really been
>>>>>> missing out *lol*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I get good results on Saturday, I'll keep using him :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:36 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> please sap don't go to the clarkside. stay in the light.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @rich, erm ya thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:34:23 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Btw, I've been working on those KOF combos LB. I've also added Clark
>>>>>> to my team. He's actually not that difficult to use. I even have a 100%
>>>>>> HD
>>>>>> combo with him and legit throw setups after knockdown.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My team order is going to be a little different now but I think I can
>>>>>> make it work. I'll be free in Blaz but I'll definitely try my best not to
>>>>>> be free in KOF *lol*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's still KOF and BlazBlue LB :P
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:29 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> rank as it stands now:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Rank*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Participant Name*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Game/Set Wins*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Points Scored*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Luminous
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 12
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 36
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SAPhoenix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 11
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 35
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sigma.g19
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 9
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 30
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lindseyboi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 27
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Zombiehunta
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 24
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> O.M.A. Hei-Long
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 18
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ennohex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 17
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 8
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ANGRY MAD JIN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ugh im number 4 , that's not good
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:21:39 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If memory serves, the suggestion tabled by Lumi is that we subtract
>>>>>> 'Points Given Up' from 'Points Scored' and add it to 'Game/Set Wins' for
>>>>>> the final result. Lumi, please correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:14 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ugh...
>>>>>> my excel skills r gna be tested today. I shall do it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 08:09:13 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought you guys just wanted to see what the current standings are
>>>>>> at the sesh. I didn't know you wanted me to keep that spreadsheet!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't save it :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry LB. You'll just have to do the math man. Either that or wait
>>>>>> until we conclude the qualifiers for the final result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:04 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> wtf man sap, wheres the excel with the current standings?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 07:59:40 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *LOL*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As requested:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://challonge.com/usf4qualifier
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://challonge.com/umvc3qualifier
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 7:34 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Morning peeps,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> why am I lagging in d3?????????? this is fkd up , im so jealous of
>>>>>> your dps right now paas, my hate for you is strong. half a million dps
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> 5 million toughness, almost 8000 dex O_o.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> have you tried to do 100% evasion build? I believe its possible now
>>>>>> since you can get over 8000 dex.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @sap, can you link us to the overall standings for the 5v5 please. My
>>>>>> predictions are that if we are 7 then I don't think Richard and manase is
>>>>>> gna make it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so the final team, in points.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> me - all points
>>>>>> gb - below me by a lot
>>>>>> lumi - above sap
>>>>>> sap - above zombie
>>>>>> zombie - above richard.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 21:58:52 +0200
>>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> along with Lust of the Dead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The script there was just as riveting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The plot for this movie sounds so crazy I just must get it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A brilliant doctor on a quest for revenge buys a young woman and
>>>>>> trains her to be the ultimate assassin, implanting gun parts in her body
>>>>>> that she must later assemble and use to kill her target before she bleeds
>>>>>> to death.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3141912/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wham
>>>>>> ACDC
>>>>>> Red hot Chilli Pepper.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 29 Jun 2014 21:49, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reason it's like that it's because the Japanese have
>>>>>> problems pronouncing V so often they write it as a B. As Manase said,
>>>>>> Japan doesn't actually have words with a V, but since the introduction of
>>>>>> Western terms into their vocabulary they were forced to create a symbol
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> it. Still, in most cases they prefer to use a B. When they know what
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> word means, they'll translate it correctly. For example, Forever is
>>>>>> "foeba" in Japanese, but it's common enough for them to know it so
>>>>>> translate it with a V. Interestingly enough, even in the original
>>>>>> Japanese, they write Mohammad Abdul's name with a V (ヴ) so even when
>>>>>> it's translated, it's still Avdol. Westerners know they mean Abdul
>>>>>> though. The same thing happens with L and R. Japanese call Rolento
>>>>>> "Lorento", presumably because they associate with the Italian name
>>>>>> "Lorenzo". In Jojo's Anjuro is more commonly known as "Angelo". At the
>>>>>> end of the day it just boils down to how familiar they are with the words
>>>>>> and names.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've never realised how many of the Jojo's characters are named after
>>>>>> music artists/songs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vanilla Ice
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steely Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kenny G
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Funny Valentine
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Telence T. Darby (should obviously be Terence)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Iggy (Pop?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Enya [Gail]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Foo Fighters
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Love the names in Jojos though. Whoever came up with the name
>>>>>> "Weather Report" is a genius.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Avdol is how Japanese read and pronounce Abdul but not how the name
>>>>>> is written.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So what we see and here in games/anime is the mispronunciation of the
>>>>>> name which is clearly wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not in Japan. lol
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's Abdul bro :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just watched eps12 and 13 of Stardust Crusaders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I miss Avdul :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank a lot man
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:54:17 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Raid 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:51 PM, <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What movie is this from?? Looks cool
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you!
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From: *Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Sender: *cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Date: *Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:35:38 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To: *<cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *ReplyTo: *cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Subject: *Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...this one
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, not that dude
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lol
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/scale_small/1/12670/263141-shome_hr.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Watching The Raid 2.
>>>>>> The baseball dude reminds me of Lumi.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>>>>>> e-mail
>>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on
>>>>>> it,
>>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
>>>>>> information
>>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
>>>>>> lost,
>>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>>>>>> services
>>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>>> Information
>>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>>>>>> by AntiVirus software.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
